I recently had the incredible opportunity to sit down with Rich Nourie, recently retired head of Abington Friends School, to talk with him about Light. Speaking with Rich for about forty minutes over Zoom is a little like traveling a great distance to spend a few days at a spiritual retreat. Rich started his career in Quaker schools at Moses Brown before working at Germantown Friends School. His wife Robin Nourie was my colleague in the English department at GFS for many years. He was the beloved head of Abington Friends School from 2005 to spring of 2024, and we had the chance to catch up over Zoom last week.
Sara: One thing that came up when I saw you in Philadelphia this summer is that we tend to get it wrong, in American culture, when we think about light as how special individuals are. I wonder if you could talk more about how you define light in opposition to that understanding.
Rich: It’s not just American culture. It’s many of our Friends Schools. One of the things that’s tricky about Quakerism is that the simplicity of it can lead to an easy misapprehension of it. You can feel like “Oh, I get it. That sounds like me. I agree with those things.”
Sara: And it can be harder than it sounds.
Rich: And the concepts are such that you can project a lot onto them, Inner Light being one of them. In such an individualistic culture, as American culture is, what we really prize is what’s special about you. In Quaker schools, sometimes that preciousness of the individual child gets conflated with this concept of Inner Light in ways that can pull us away from its real meaning and power. And there really is a tremendous role for the uniqueness of each one of us. And I love the fact that our education is for a wide range of outcomes and not a single one. We need the poets and the caretakers and the comedians and the musicians and the analysts and the data scientists and the activists and the politicians. All of those roles are necessary for a right, functioning world. So I love the fact that we do prize the diversity of roles and paths of individuals, in the discernment each person is called to, to find their relationship between what they love, what the world needs, and what they’re good at. All of that is true, and I would never dismiss the incredible value of each individual and their unique gifts..
But it shouldn’t be confused with the concept of Inner Light, because Inner Light is what Quakers point to as what is sacred in the universe, in all of creation. It is “That of God” that courses through all of life. It is the ground from which all life is formed; it is the essential nature at the heart of each one of us – where we’re from, where we’re destined to be at our fullest and finest as human beings.
Sara: I feel susceptible to the over-abbreviation of Inner Light that we’re talking about… If I’m hearing you right: the wonder we take in each student, or the beauty of what they’re showing us of who they are inside. That’s not mutually exclusive with what you’re talking about, but it’s not what you’re talking about.
Rich: When we think about Quaker teachings, we often think first about the testimonies, and understandably. They’re so valuable to our lives in community. But the true central idea of Quakerism is that we’re always in the presence of the sacred. It is within us, around us, between us. It is that sacred energy, the goodness that animates the universe. It is the goodness from which we come. It is the inexhaustible supply of love in the universe. It is the larger transcendent true reality, that is so far beyond our comprehension but which we have a capacity to be enriched by and in attunement with. That is our calling, to live attuned to that greater truth. We’re not meant to be perfect, not meant to be all. That light which is at the heart of every one of us, is refracted through each of us as individuals, in beautiful ways.
Sara: Do you think light and truth are closer to synonyms than people think?
Rich: I think they are. My commencement words this year were about this central idea that we’re always in the presence of the sacred. We as human beings have a tremendous capacity to be responsive to the sacred, but because we are easily distracted and easily deluded, we live with a flickering connection to that deeper identity. One way to create a common ground of talking about it is: transcendent experience. When we are in the presence of the ocean, that is larger than us, it invites us into a larger sense of being without diminishing us.
Sara: That gets me wondering if part of the work in a Quaker school is to make that more accessible, to keep that wonder more available. Silence is one tool.
Rich: Silence in Friends schools is a beautiful invitation, but we often walk into that meeting as asleep as anyone. That’s who we are as humans. What I would say is: Light is a metaphor for the sacred. So the question I have is: what are the qualities of light that can teach us about the sacred? Light illuminates without coercion. Light is warm. Light shines through. There’s a peacefulness to its extraordinary energy. Light doesn’t feel frenetic. If Light is a metaphor for the sacred, how can an inquiry into the qualities of light teach us more about the sacred: how can we think about light in that way?
Sara: I wondered if you had thoughts about what it was like when you were head of a Quaker school, to be a religious institution open to a lot of different belief systems. You must have seen a lot of different reasons people were there, and I wonder how you approached that range?
Rich: What I have loved about being the head of a Quaker school is: we are unusual in our ability to form a genuine spiritual community amidst a wide diversity of relationships to formal religion or not, religious traditions or not. We live in a truly postmodern age where many people have moved beyond their family traditions or married within traditions… We’re called to, with intention, create lives of spirit, of goodness. Quakerism gives us a wonderful opportunity, as a non-creedal religion.
It doesn’t ask us to believe very much with specificity, because more than being doctrinal, it’s experiential. It asks you to say what you know and not more than that. It us to be open to this broad, liberal, generous idea about what it means to be human beings. In the freedom to invoke spirit, the sacred, we have this opportunity to talk about the mystery of life. Because we are spiritual beings. We have the capacity of knowing on a deeper level that we don’t have to pretend doesn’t exist simply because we don’t agree on the same religious terminology. In our larger culture, because we’re a religiously diverse country, we have completely secularized the public space, because out of good intention, we want to avoid division or disrespect; but what we’ve lost is the ability to talk about that collective deeper reality and the search that’s at the heart of it, the mystery of it. As a Quaker school, we’re allowed to talk about that stuff. With a breadth of language, a breadth of metaphors that are points of entry for anyone.
Sara: In closing, I wonder if there are times when as a head of school you had tapped best into Light, gone past metaphor and into the experience of Light.
Rich: There are lots of ways to be a valuable head of school. You form an ecology around your style of leadership. What is the ecology and weather that you create? For me, the role I played is first of all, continually reminding people of this set of unique responsibilities and opportunities we have as teachers and parents in this very special Quaker, spiritual setting. I draw a lot of inspiration from wide spiritual reading and podcasts and from my own religious practice as a progressive Catholic; I joke that at this point in my life and career, I am Quatholic. Feeding that set of ideas for yourself so you can provide that role if you’re called to it as a head of school, that this is what this work is about, this is how at our best we see each other, this is how when things break down we find a way to reset
Sara: And a community might need to hear they just leaned in well, or they faced a hard moment well together.
Rich: You just named something really important. We have to respect the depth and developmental nature that adults need to do in order to grow. We shorthand all the time. We think just by telling people that they are going to change. We know that change is predicated on deep learning. We’re good at it with kids, at designing learning that respects the pace of learning – the discovery that is genuine and linked to where a person is. But we sometimes forget we need to do that same kind of planning and design for our adult communities.
Sara: Thank you, Rich!